On 04/22/2012 10:55 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On 04/22/2012 05:28 AM, Steven J Long wrote: >> Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> >>> | 3. New udev and separate /usr partition (30 minutes) >>> | >>> | See [4]: "Decide on whether a separate /usr is still a supported >>> | configuration. If it is, newer udev can not be stabled and >>> | alternatives should be investigated. If it isn't, a lot of >>> | documentation will have to be updated. (And an alternative should >>> | likely still be provided.)" >>> | >>> | [4] >>> | [<http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo- >> project/msg_c96d1b724cd736702820fa5ff1547557.xml> >>> >> From the first reply: >> >> "To clarify, the question is whether or not we support a separate /usr >> _without_ mounting it early via an initramfs." >> >> I hope that settles that particular issue. >> > > Hmm... I see that in Zac's reply, thanks for that. > > Unfortunately, from what I can tell, that clarification was not actually > part of the proposed agenda [5], nor was it directly referenced. So the > subject of the vote still seems open to interpretation.
Yeah, it almost seems as though the council was being intentionally vague and leaving things open to interpretation. In response, we had William post about the ">= udev-182 tracker" [1], to which Tony seemed to respond positively [2]. [1] http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_015e73cfccbd72fa956a8bdbc2e9cdc0.xml [2] http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_fb17ccaadc95c7f3f27d0613c13aa04e.xml -- Thanks, Zac
