On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:19:11 +0000 "Robin H. Johnson" <robb...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 04:50:49PM +0200, Corentin Chary wrote: > > >> $ ./mirrors.py --all --count > > >> 297 ?? ?? http://pear.php.net > > >> 297 ?? ?? http://pear.php.net/get > > >> 88 ?? ?? ??http://pecl.php.net > > >> 88 ?? ?? ??http://pecl.php.net/get > > > These are already mirror bouncers. If you visit the above, you'll > > > get the closest mirror for downloading. > > And since there is already ~10 "mirrors" with only one actual > > backend, should they go to thirdpartymirrors or not ? If not, what > > about this pseudo-mirrors already present in thirdpartymirrors ? > I think we should add the pseudo-mirrors, but explicitly mark them as > such in the file, so that they don't get duplicate entries added (eg > adding us.pear, de.pear and the pear bouncer is bad. Should have just > the bouncer). It'd be great if we could add some kind of additional mirror entries, which would be used by repoman to signal missing mirror:// entries but won't be used for downloads. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
