On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:19:11 +0000 > "Robin H. Johnson" <robb...@gentoo.org> wrote: > >> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 04:50:49PM +0200, Corentin Chary wrote: >> > >> $ ./mirrors.py --all --count >> > >> 297 ?? ?? http://pear.php.net >> > >> 297 ?? ?? http://pear.php.net/get >> > >> 88 ?? ?? ??http://pecl.php.net >> > >> 88 ?? ?? ??http://pecl.php.net/get >> > > These are already mirror bouncers. If you visit the above, you'll >> > > get the closest mirror for downloading. >> > And since there is already ~10 "mirrors" with only one actual >> > backend, should they go to thirdpartymirrors or not ? If not, what >> > about this pseudo-mirrors already present in thirdpartymirrors ? >> I think we should add the pseudo-mirrors, but explicitly mark them as >> such in the file, so that they don't get duplicate entries added (eg >> adding us.pear, de.pear and the pear bouncer is bad. Should have just >> the bouncer). > > It'd be great if we could add some kind of additional mirror entries, > which would be used by repoman to signal missing mirror:// entries but > won't be used for downloads.
Yep, we could put that in it too: github http://github.com/downloads/ https://github.com/downloads/ nongnu http://download.savannah.nongnu.org/releases/ (I'm not really sure for nongnu). -- Corentin Chary http://xf.iksaif.net
