On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Rich Freeman <[email protected]> wrote: > Well, only Robin can explain exactly what he meant, but it sounds like > we don't want the committer field to ever have a non-gentoo email in > it, and signatures should be gentoo as well. So, if a dev just > applies a patch to their tree/etc then there is no issue (just set > author). If a dev wants to actually pull in a commit they'd need to > edit the fields accordingly and re-sign it. Not sure offhand how to > best do that (I assume it is possible - probably with some variation > on rebase or something rebase calls).
Well, it doesn't seem like a big deal IF there's an explicit merge commit that's signed by a dev. Cheers, Dirkjan
