El jue, 13-09-2012 a las 04:30 +1000, Michael Palimaka escribió: > On 2012-09-13 03:59, Pacho Ramos wrote: > > Hello > > > > Currently, package maintainers are CCed to security bugs when their are > > needed. The problem is that, once maintainers add a fixed version and > > tell security team they are ok to get it stabilized, maintainers are > > kept CCed until bug is closed by security team. This usually means > > getting a lot of mail after some time when security team discuss if a > > GLSA should be filled or not, if security bot adds some comment... some > > of that comments are applied to really old bugs that need no action from > > maintainers. > > > > Maybe would be interesting to change the policy to unCC maintainers > > again when their action is no longer required. > > > > What do you think? > > > > Thanks for your thoughts > > > > Hello, > > Is the policy you describe officially documented, or just current behaviour? >
I don't know, at least it's the current behavior, but I don't know if it's a policy :/ > In KDE and Qt herds for example, we usually just unCC ourselves when > we've taken the required action. > > Best regards, > Michael > > >
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
