On 12/17/2012 05:40 AM, Olav Vitters wrote: > On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 03:17:05PM -0500, Richard Yao wrote: >> On 12/15/2012 02:33 PM, Michał Górny wrote: >>> On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 13:58:43 -0500 >>> "Walter Dnes" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 07:07:09PM +0100, Micha?? G??rny wrote >>>>> Waaait, what? Did something change lately or are you just repeating >>>>> the same bullshit for months? >>>> >>>> Older systemd boots OK with a separate /usr and eudev. But somehow, >>>> somewhere along the line, as part of the merge, the udev portion of the >>>> systemd tarball requires initramfs. See news item... >>>> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/engine?do=post_attachment;postatt_id=36326;list=gentoo >>>> It was actually finally released 2012-03-16. If you disagree with that >>>> news item, complain directly to its author. If you can boot a udev-181 >>>> or higher system with a separate /usr, and no intrd/initramfs, I'm sure >>>> a lot of people would be very interested in knowing how. >>> >>> This was a Gentoo decision, not an upstream one. >> >> If I recall, WilliamH stated at the time that he believed that upstream >> would make avoiding it increasingly difficult. My impression was that he >> felt coerced into making that change. > > So systemd still works with a separate /usr and you're continuing to > spread misinformation. Demonstrating such behaviour while complaining > about the behaviour of upstream is IMO very ironic.
I believe that the systemd upstream developers would disagree. They claim is that this is completely broken and any attempt to make it work (such as what we are discussing) is strongly discouraged.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
