On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 19:47:58 +0800 Patrick Lauer <patr...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On 02/10/2013 05:01 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > > # Pacho Ramos <pa...@gentoo.org> (10 Feb 2013) > > # Fails with gcc-4.7, crashes (#301946, #312073), problems with > > # boost (#319921), problems with python-2.7 (#338826), really old > > # version in the tree, people should move to sci overlay one (#424659). > > # Removal in a month. > > sci-visualization/paraview > > So instead of moving things from random overlays to the tree we remove > packages now, remove features from other packages because of that > (openfoam) and then ... tell users to use an overlay? > > Somehow this appears not well thought out to me. Would anyone be > terribly upset if I started pillaging this silly overlay? (And any other > overlays that look like they are fun) +1. If you can't manage moving/updating your packages properly and on-time from the sci overlay, please get rid of it. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
