-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 24/04/13 09:10 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 07:32:44PM -0400, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina > wrote: >> On 04/24/2013 07:17 PM, William Hubbs wrote: >>> >>> This would actually be cleaner than a bogus dependency in >>> OpenRC. I would probably call it virtual/network-manager >>> though. >>> >> You can't call it virtual/network-manager, that calls to mind, >> you know, net-misc/networkmanager. That's just too confusing >> imho. I wouldn't object to virtual/net, or pretty much anything >> else that isn't confusing. The net scripts are not a network >> manager, networkmanager, wicd, even wpa_supplicant would be >> things I would consider to be network managers. > > But the oldnet scripts do run wpa_supplicant, dhcp clients, etc, > for each interface they manage. > > Newnet doesn't even try that, it just manages static interfaces > and assumes that you will use a dhcp client or something like > wpa_supplicant in standalone mode to control your interfaces. >
virtual/network-init ? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAlF4iUoACgkQ2ugaI38ACPCvSAEAgSXxzswzYmOfJGl27vtb4C4w 1RjxSoLzAIAl1htEmr4A/3q3QIghpzNlG0Fmawu3eR8ML6BRf+HWwJplIWhvM6F8 =BHp8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
