-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 08/08/13 11:38, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> i'm not volunteering but I never really got why our GNOME
> maintainers insisted on staying with it instead of going with the
> distribution after it was clear logind is a dead end on non-systemd
> systemd

Ok,

So there's lots of people that don't want systemd.  Can't we group
together and have some kind of an affect on upstream?  Upstream
appears to be suffering the same split we found with portage, in that
the specification that people are working to is in fact the only
implementation (as least, that's how I read the fact that a separate
logind which follows the specification will no longer work without
systemd explicitly?).  We now have paludis, pkgcore and the PMS.  Is
there some way, we as the Gentoo Foundation, Developers or even just
Users can form a petition, or an open letter, that might make enough
impact on the Gnome foundation for them to reconsider their position?

Perhaps if there were an "init system specification" project, separate
from systemd, that systemd had to adhere to rather than deciding to
change the rules at a random version (like 205), then Gnome could
potentially have other options than just systemd?

Does anyone know how Gnome is dealing with being run under non-linux
systems given the new systemd hard dependency?  Is it simply not
shutting down, etc?  Can we introduce a similar build capability so
that people can have a "non-full" Gnome installation that still
includes most of the apps?

Either way, bickering amongst ourselves won't have any effect,
fighting against upstream's changes seems similarly futile (they have
no reason to improve the situation if we're happy to do the extra work
when things are bad), so the best chance we have is communicating with
upstream and asking them to reconsider.  That's not guaranteed to
work, but focusing our efforts on that, rather than lengthy arguments
about time-intensive Gentoo solutions seems like a better option...

Mike  5:)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlIEAiAACgkQu7rWomwgFXpYUgCgk+XJynbo4MCRcFlqHrYtDgyV
U+UAnAnn6tnrYYx/3ptOU7EGJF0efCyu
=R4BF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to