On Fri, 9 Aug 2013 12:37:26 +0100 Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Aug 2013 19:31:22 +0800 > Patrick Lauer <patr...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > Somehow I get really confused by this selective perception (anyone > > remembering the KDE overlay getting paludised and the fallout from > > that?) > > That's a very selective perception there. If you mean the fully > documented kdebuild-1 EAPI, whose features are mostly in EAPI 5 now, > then I remember Gentoo getting a lot of valuable experience that was > used to decide how to improve the package format. Not sure how this is still relevant to the Gnome 3.8 stabilization; Patrick's example brought some irrelevant matters to mind, but what this really is about as he intended is a "QA violation". He just clarified in the other thread as well as on IRC that by this QA violation he means that there is no proper upgrade path; so, I no longer see any use in that example as it has became clear without it. -- With kind regards, Tom Wijsman (TomWij) Gentoo Developer E-mail address : tom...@gentoo.org GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
