Dnia 2013-08-15, o godz. 00:19:40 hasufell <[email protected]> napisał(a):
> On 08/14/2013 10:56 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: > > > > If you want PMS to go away, and call portage the one-and-true PM for > > Gentoo, then it's probably something for the Council to decide. > > > > I think that would make sense. We don't have enough resources for such > fun and overcoming PMS burdens has been a major concern for everyone who > is looking to improve basic functionality. And do we have the resources to fix the tree every time someone decides on an awesome improvement that obviously can't hurt anything? > In the end, people rather go > for eclass solutions or just give up. That has brought us to the current > discussion, to base.eclass and to the multilib eclasses with a very > painful way of migration. Mind that I am an author of one of those > eclasses as well, so I'm not generally objecting. But it's a fact that > portage multilib was held back basically by useless PMS politics, so > that we can support alternative PMs like paludis. If you mean that we should make the multilib-portage mess the official way for people to obtain 32-bit wine, then deity-of-choice bless PMS! -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
