-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 08/15/2013 01:23 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > Dnia 2013-08-15, o godz. 00:19:40 hasufell <[email protected]> > napisał(a): > >> On 08/14/2013 10:56 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: >>> >>> If you want PMS to go away, and call portage the one-and-true >>> PM for Gentoo, then it's probably something for the Council to >>> decide. >>> >> >> I think that would make sense. We don't have enough resources for >> such fun and overcoming PMS burdens has been a major concern for >> everyone who is looking to improve basic functionality. > > And do we have the resources to fix the tree every time someone > decides on an awesome improvement that obviously can't hurt > anything? >
I have no idea what that means. Global changes are _always_ discussed in the community. PMS doesn't add anything to that process. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSDB0TAAoJEFpvPKfnPDWzU/sH/1ml/Zq/p/bxju9u/w+7Alxg 9PTUXVZRcGTlOT5+DDSYIUB8R0j0bKMxJLuJKPovNfIF42YyD4uQs2ewcScpQ+s8 y8wTfFOTUwpfnRJdhLDGguw4MOFPpHMTQgAKhiY00SUgfuzBEyUoZ6OuqDdyoeUc RapXUBK4qrDFJ8s/6tsLCKtca7Jv47Ct6deNk8CWauKz3t1Zj65Qtb5qAYkc2wu5 sYLOidwLhUID6v/eGfZ+HhFRAkBawRfWnc5fn+Mz9SLSKxecYUX34F+3ZA99Pc+U sUYVsvgz4PN9qOUxb9m7q9Ii4yLxni6vJS48C6pQN62Yv7M0PUmHLWK6GN+dFew= =PG3m -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
