El mié, 14-08-2013 a las 23:53 +0800, Patrick Lauer escribió: [...] > Well, it should reflect reality. > > PMS is still broken as much as it does not reflect the state of portage > before PMS was written, and we've had to patch it up a few times to make > it coherent, plus it is still lacking half the things that would make it > useful as a standard. > > Your academic interpretation of standard as a platonic ideal > disconnected from reality serves no purpose. >
On this topic I agree with Patrick: I don't fully understand why things (like in_iuse from eutils.eclass) are missing from PMS. If that applies to more features that were forgotten when writing PMS, we have a problem :(
