>>>>> On Thu, 15 Aug 2013, Pacho Ramos wrote: > I don't fully understand why things (like in_iuse from > eutils.eclass) are missing from PMS.
How should this feature have made it into PMS by now? AFAICS, you've first proposed it in the following posting, two days after EAPI 5 was approved: http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/260662 It's on the list of features for EAPI 6, so it will be included if the council approves it. Also it would certainly help if you would attach a wording for the specification to bug 449862. > If that applies to more features that were forgotten when writing > PMS, we have a problem :( Sorry, but the PMS team's crystal ball is broken. So we cannot include things before someone proposes them. ;) Ulrich
