On 23/09/13 16:08, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 23/09/13 15:52, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Mon, 23 Sep 2013, Samuli Suominen wrote:
Because I've seen some commits today for reverting the mentioned
KEYWORDS to ~arch in some ebuilds I'm not sure if everyone is aware that
the arch status is set using profiles/profiles.desc and as I'm writing
this, the mentioned arches are still 'stable', not 'dev'
No matter what the news item or whatever says, only profiles.desc counts
That's a thing that was never quite clear to me. Should there be
a one-to-one correspondence between an arch marked stable in
profiles.desc (i.e. having at least one profile labelled as stable
there) and the same arch having stable keywords?
of course...
There is at least one example for an arch that is only dev in
profiles.desc but used to have stable keywords (sh), and another arch
where it's the other way around (amd64-fbsd).
Ulrich
i'm a bit confused, why do you think sh is not an stable arch?
it's still an stable arch like m68k and s390 is... until someone changes
those lines as per council's vote.
ah, scratch that, got it now -- vapier already started downgrading the
'sh' status earlier, before the council's vote by changing the profiles.desc
