On 01/04/14 20:46, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > On 04/01/2014 01:34 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote: >> So not, at any time, eudev users saw their implementation being replaced >> by another by the PM. > > This is reassuring. If I can get reassurances that eudev and udev > will proceed forward on equal footing in the tree then I will feel > much better about the situation. > > Can I get that reassurance from you? >
Yes, you can. I did not try to push eudev out from the users systems, or from the tree, in any backdoored fashion, nor I ever will. My full intention has always been to inform eudev maintainers if there will be changes that will require them to take action, and I believe I did it this time, and have done so, many times before this. If you believed something like that was going on, I surely understand where you have been coming from the whole time, let me just assure you that was not it. - Samuli
