On 04/01/2014 01:45 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 01/04/14 20:46, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
On 04/01/2014 01:34 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
So not, at any time, eudev users saw their implementation being replaced
by another by the PM.
This is reassuring. If I can get reassurances that eudev and udev
will proceed forward on equal footing in the tree then I will feel
much better about the situation.
Can I get that reassurance from you?
Yes, you can.
I did not try to push eudev out from the users systems, or from the
tree, in any backdoored fashion, nor I ever will.
My full intention has always been to inform eudev maintainers if there
will be changes that will require them to take action,
and I believe I did it this time, and have done so, many times before this.
If you believed something like that was going on, I surely understand
where you have been coming from the whole time,
let me just assure you that was not it.
- Samuli
Thank you. Let's put an end to the bickering.
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail : [email protected]
GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA
GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA
