On 02/04/14 13:45, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 2. April 2014, 10:29:28 schrieb Samuli Suominen: >> On 02/04/14 11:28, Tom Wijsman wrote: >>> On Wed, 02 Apr 2014 09:00:19 +0300 >>> >>> Samuli Suominen <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> On 02/04/14 05:02, Matt Turner wrote: >>>>> You don't seem to understand what Samuli is saying. QA is being used >>>>> as an offensive weapon. It's a stick to bludgeon others with. >>>> Exactly. Anyone remembers what happened the last time this was tried? >>>> >>>> [...] >>> What does the previous QA team's actions have to do with this topic? >> It's the previous QA team's actions and mistakes we can learn from. >> You know, to avoid repeating them. >> > Correct me if I'm wrong, but weren't you one of these QA team members, Samuli? >
Yes, the situation was different in a sense that QA members themself disagreed back then, which lead to the back then lead removing members (not only me) without even notifying them from the membership list. So, I have pretty good insight how bad things could go... - Samuli
