On 06/13/2014 14:08, Greg Turner wrote: > On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 6:38 AM, Rich Freeman <ri...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> add the strip-flags statement to the ebuild and be done >> with it > > To do it "greenly" we'd obviously want to know the precise surface > area of the problem and then to correctly express those circumstances > in eblit code that could stand up to the test of time. Anyone know > what exactly /is/ the surface area of the problem? Already the eblit > filters the flag iff ( gcc-specs-ssp && test-flags-CC > -fno-stack-protector )
Does anyone know of an upstream glibc bug on this? The version referenced in #332823 is 2.12, which is a bit old. Does this still happen on 2.19? I have to assume that the glibc folks will eventually have to take a look at this if gcc is going to make SSP default in 4.8.3 and up. If there is a patch available for glibc to correct this, that might be the better path. -- Joshua Kinard Gentoo/MIPS ku...@gentoo.org 4096R/D25D95E3 2011-03-28 "The past tempts us, the present confuses us, the future frightens us. And our lives slip away, moment by moment, lost in that vast, terrible in-between." --Emperor Turhan, Centauri Republic
