On 06/13/2014 14:41, Joshua Kinard wrote: > On 06/13/2014 14:08, Greg Turner wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 6:38 AM, Rich Freeman <ri...@gentoo.org> wrote: >>> add the strip-flags statement to the ebuild and be done >>> with it >> >> To do it "greenly" we'd obviously want to know the precise surface >> area of the problem and then to correctly express those circumstances >> in eblit code that could stand up to the test of time. Anyone know >> what exactly /is/ the surface area of the problem? Already the eblit >> filters the flag iff ( gcc-specs-ssp && test-flags-CC >> -fno-stack-protector ) > > I just found this on our forums, too. Kinda odd that a change of -march > args to gcc would apparently correct the same problem. I don't have a > non-hardened system available that can test this, though. >
::headdesk:: Forgot to include the link: http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-861624-view-next.html Some googling suggests that the __libc_multiple_libcs multiple definition error is triggered by a variety of things. Kinda like when glibc fails midway through the sunrpc folder. There's a GCC-4.7 regression that fixed one in gcc bug #51117. -- Joshua Kinard Gentoo/MIPS ku...@gentoo.org 4096R/D25D95E3 2011-03-28 "The past tempts us, the present confuses us, the future frightens us. And our lives slip away, moment by moment, lost in that vast, terrible in-between." --Emperor Turhan, Centauri Republic
