On 27/07/14 14:50, hasufell wrote: > Samuli Suominen: >> On 26/07/14 15:49, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >>> On Sat, 26 Jul 2014 12:41:16 +0000 (UTC) >>> Martin Vaeth <mar...@mvath.de> wrote: >>>> hasufell <hasuf...@gentoo.org> wrote: >>>>> Dynamics deps are already broken, not consistently enabled (e.g. >>>>> when subslots are in use) >>>> Just to make it clear: No, dynamic deps are not broken. >>> Yes they are. >> We just succesfully converted ~300 ebuilds in tree without revision >> bumps from virtual/udev[gudev,introspection,static-libs] >> to virtual/libudev and virtual/libgudev >> Tested it on multiple boxes, went fine. Nobody has filed bugs at >> http://bugs.gentoo.org/, nobody has filed a single forums post, >> nobody has said anything at #gentoo, Freenode >> Only one person said he had to manually build 2 GNOME related packages, >> simple-scan and something else >> >> So, broken? Far from it. More like essential feature. >> >> People have just listed some known races dynamic deps have, and I take >> those races anyday over an regression that causes >> endless rebuilding... >> > I'm not sure if you realize that you just disabled dynamic deps support > on most of those converted ebuilds. >
There is a bug in the package manager, you mean.
