Samuli Suominen: > > On 26/07/14 15:49, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >> On Sat, 26 Jul 2014 12:41:16 +0000 (UTC) >> Martin Vaeth <mar...@mvath.de> wrote: >>> hasufell <hasuf...@gentoo.org> wrote: >>>> Dynamics deps are already broken, not consistently enabled (e.g. >>>> when subslots are in use) >>> Just to make it clear: No, dynamic deps are not broken. >> Yes they are. > > We just succesfully converted ~300 ebuilds in tree without revision > bumps from virtual/udev[gudev,introspection,static-libs] > to virtual/libudev and virtual/libgudev > Tested it on multiple boxes, went fine. Nobody has filed bugs at > http://bugs.gentoo.org/, nobody has filed a single forums post, > nobody has said anything at #gentoo, Freenode > Only one person said he had to manually build 2 GNOME related packages, > simple-scan and something else > > So, broken? Far from it. More like essential feature. > > People have just listed some known races dynamic deps have, and I take > those races anyday over an regression that causes > endless rebuilding... >
I'm not sure if you realize that you just disabled dynamic deps support on most of those converted ebuilds.
