> On Nov 17, 2014, at 7:03 PM, hasufell <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> On 11/18/2014 12:47 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
>> Am Dienstag, 18. November 2014, 00:38:36 schrieb hasufell:
>> 
>> We just don't want to answer a thousand 
>> questions when things break for others. That is the whole point of sane 
>> defaults.
> 
> Except that sane defaults are not a substitute for correct dependencies
> (like people omitting USE flag deps on libsdl, because they assume users
> won't disable them).
> 
> Also, you don't have to answer questions if it's clear that certain
> settings break stuff and what they break. There are ways to communicate
> this (even in USE flag descriptions).
> If you don't communicate it, then you will have to answers questions...
> 

Can we all agree that dependencies should be correct regardless of the use flag 
settings?  And leave the rest of this discussion to the bikeshed it belongs in 
? :)

Reply via email to