On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 11:05:31 +0100
Pacho Ramos <pa...@gentoo.org> wrote:

> El lun, 08-12-2014 a las 14:46 -0500, Rich Freeman escribió:
> > On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Michael Orlitzky <m...@gentoo.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > It doesn't look like it's going to work so well without
> > > cpufrequtils. There's a new homepage with a few new releases at:
> > >
> > 
> > Are there any actual issues with cpufrequtils, beyond having a dead
> > upstream?
> 
> It's explained at:
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=484242#c1
> 
> Also, indeed, other distributions killed it long time ago (usually in
> favor of cpupower, the "kernel-tools" pointed at
> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/cpufrequtils.git/tree/dead.package
> )
> 
> Regarding the gkrellm-plugins, looks like Fedora is supplying this
> one:
> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/gkrellm-freq.git/tree/gkrellm-freq.spec
> 
> 
> 
> 
gkrellm-freq-1.0 was removed from the tree:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334907
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=339908
http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/x11-plugins/gkrellm-gkfreq/ChangeLog?view=markup
But it looks like there's a new 2.3 version of it:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/gkrellm-gkfreq/
I will try to recreate ebuild in my overlay and test it.

Reply via email to