On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 11:05:31 +0100 Pacho Ramos <[email protected]> wrote:
> El lun, 08-12-2014 a las 14:46 -0500, Rich Freeman escribió: > > On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Michael Orlitzky <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > It doesn't look like it's going to work so well without > > > cpufrequtils. There's a new homepage with a few new releases at: > > > > > > > Are there any actual issues with cpufrequtils, beyond having a dead > > upstream? > > It's explained at: > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=484242#c1 > > Also, indeed, other distributions killed it long time ago (usually in > favor of cpupower, the "kernel-tools" pointed at > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/cpufrequtils.git/tree/dead.package > ) > > Regarding the gkrellm-plugins, looks like Fedora is supplying this > one: > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/gkrellm-freq.git/tree/gkrellm-freq.spec > > > > gkrellm-freq-1.0 was removed from the tree: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334907 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=339908 http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/x11-plugins/gkrellm-gkfreq/ChangeLog?view=markup But it looks like there's a new 2.3 version of it: http://sourceforge.net/projects/gkrellm-gkfreq/ I will try to recreate ebuild in my overlay and test it.
