A team is clearly violating GLEP39 and you don't care: > It may have one or many leads, and the leads are selected by the members of > the project. This selection must occur at least once every 12 months, and may > occur at any time.
Instead we are getting tree inconsistency, because people start to ignore the team. That is the worst that could happen. I wonder why you were not so picky about the QA team back then. Maybe the solution is point 3 of GLEP39 under the rationale section: > If the council does a lousy job handling global issues (or has no global > vision), vote out the bums
