All, I'm seeing at least two ways of handling zsh completion files in the tree.
The first is in a package I maintain and several others in the tree -- using the zsh-completion use flag along with an rdepend on app-shells/zsh behind the use flag. The package I maintain that does this is www-client/pybugz, but you will find several other packages doing the same thing. The other method is shown by dev-vcs/hub at least, and maybe several other packages -- e.g. unconditionally installing the completions according to our small files installation practice and not reflecting the rdepend on app-shells/zsh. I think we should be consistent with how we handle this, and personally I would vote for the first way since zsh is not all that common. However, if the feeling is that we should nuke the zsh-completion use flag, I'll be the first to do it, and I'll start opening bugs against other packages. Comments/discussion are welcome. William
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
