-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Am Donnerstag, 26. März 2015, 17:51:04 schrieb William Hubbs:
> I'm seeing at least two ways of handling zsh completion files in the > tree. > [...] > The other method is shown by dev-vcs/hub at least, and maybe several > other packages -- e.g. unconditionally installing the completions > according to our small files installation practice and not reflecting > the rdepend on app-shells/zsh. > > I think we should be consistent with how we handle this, and personally > I would vote for the first way since zsh is not all that common. > However, if the feeling is that we should nuke the zsh-completion use > flag, I'll be the first to do it, and I'll start opening bugs against > other packages. Please let's nuke the useflag and install the files unconditionally. This is the overall agreed policy for small add-on files. (The only real alternative would be to finally, please, please, please introduce IUSE_RUNTIME. Which just got booted from EAPI=6 again.) - -- Andreas K. Huettel Gentoo Linux developer (council, perl, libreoffice) [email protected] http://www.akhuettel.de/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVF+6gAAoJEB9VdM6hupKV0LAP/0NZxMJ0Gt+Fz89la1LTkfpq 88HehQQ7u69liFX+/EI+dWMS8ZCzg9H1VefhIWwDIC42LAVE+gPbheVBSgfcqFr2 8KLsPrl4Vp++XyidScE5CD71Oy/XXK6wsy8VoPQtppGAKEh56+cqIdSwUpU4W4yj o1blqw+/pnwuuxnwdVGuhrht24xVhMdZOTDGVpUqscxIiEvn9lDFQydy7OYZlk3n wQsQQ5SiCWZXHJjhSxbvRBSIzXVt4enp/f/mUpf+p3f16M2tS/ALeCpR/TB1o62d FPWCDPaMzxMaAIoxObQ021cRWOcZ09kBxJstI/7J1Vnw0W0zFyLlevJ6wmwoimGl Vav1zGZMk0cl/ft8c6nlRi876eDwpwGAhsF51MM4ijtB4mBkBveR+gLUjHDdOYWq jOqOysDF1Fv0JeVwJEpk71HotcN/ev1GE3DlveaGssT9lPb1sQrCRydkIxwKKuoQ v/AjeBkTSliQ0vtYID4hUdSlVTpkcdURqtckuXJiVxqxhOMh87XKuzR67R16hUU2 mgizmqYnlnSm9+cG4XKDE3y3q4w1QIynjZyjQJDWySaF7yV6SRSuyEaTK///1ufH k1E0NX9IG+9uIzxUgxhh3GqCy8h5pqFvXXHtGYJU5ipUVJCfVHQAGcWNY+qga6dB 3j1XVICXWyptqyXhfJFu =YceU -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
