Hi!
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015, Michał Górny wrote:
> Dnia 2015-08-11, o godz. 15:52:16
> Patrice Clement <monsie...@gentoo.org> napisał(a):
>
> > According to
> > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Gentoo_git_workflow#Branching_Model,
> > "there may be developer-specific, task-specific, project-specific branches
> > etc". As far as I understand, it means I can go and create my own branch on
> > the
> > main repository and push it and it gets spread all over the place. Is that
> > correct?
> >
> > Could someone explain to me the rationale behind this decision?
> >
> > Truth to be told, I kinda dislike the fact any developer can do this.
>
> As long as it's used with caution, I don't see a problem. Of course it
> would be bad if everyone pushed branches for any minor change. However,
> if there is a long-term work going on a branch, I don't see a problem
> with keeping it public.
I agree with monsierp here, person-level stuff should not be in
the official repo.
Also note that "not in the main repo" does not mean "non-public".
People (and projects) can always publish their version of the
tree somewhere else.
I personally even dislike the project branches, but those I am
more willing to accept.
Regards,
Tobias
PS: Call me a pessimist, but every time I see "if it's used with
caution", I think: yeah, but it won't.
--
Sent from aboard the Culture ship
Fine Till You Came Along
