On 08/12/2015 08:38 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 3:40 AM, hasufell <[email protected]> wrote:
>> So, I've just tried to count the ++ for different ideas and even if I
>> missed one or two or misread someone's opinion, I think the result is
>> pretty clear:
>>
>> reference the bug only in the summary: 1
>> don't make any of this mandatory: 1
>> "Gentoo-Bug: 123" or similar short form: 9
>> "Gentoo-Bug: <url>" or similar long form: 2-3
> 
> I'm in favor of Gentoo-Bug: <url> in case we're voting.

May be "Bug-Gentoo" should be used instead. It's to use the same header
name format as Debian in their patches ("Bug-Debian").

-- 
Best regards, Dmitry

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to