-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 12/08/15 12:34 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > Dnia 2015-08-12, o godz. 18:25:07 Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn > <chith...@gentoo.org> napisał(a): > >> Michał Górny schrieb: >>>> Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=333531 format, >>>> with the "https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id="; >>>> optional for Gentoo Bugzilla, would be a compromise I can >>>> accept. I would not like having to redundantly give the bug >>>> number when I already gave the URL. >>> Can we make it clear whether we are allowed/supposed to use >>> the short form: >>> >>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/333531 >>> >>> ? >>> >> >> As that redirects to the longer form I don't see a problem with >> allowing that. >> >> Note that the short form does not allow for referencing >> individual comments, because https://bugs.gentoo.org/333531#c4 >> redirects to https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=333531 and >> not https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=333531#c4 > > Well, to be clear it doesn't actually redirect. If you didn't use > one of those fancy new-age web browsers, you'd notice #c4 works > as expected. I suspect it does some fancy JavaScript addressbar > update though. Anyway, breaking '#c4' should be definitely > treated as a bug, not expected limitation. >
Can we assume if a URL is to be the format, that any URL which resolves to whatever it is you're trying to link to is permitted (within reason, ideally we don't want ones with 128-character-long session-id hashes in them of course)..? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iF4EAREIAAYFAlXLdtQACgkQAJxUfCtlWe06rQEAiTu9MxA6AeEnGXahOtd7c74U c0rLqHJcXmgRPrdj/qwA/2i7CtmCU2uNoaq0tlcaqIky6cgtxY7pQ9bNDTRM0ujH =1f2m -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
