Dnia 2015-08-12, o godz. 18:25:07 Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn <chith...@gentoo.org> napisał(a):
> Michał Górny schrieb: > >> Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=333531 format, with the > >> "https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id="; optional for Gentoo > >> Bugzilla, would be a compromise I can accept. I would not like having > >> to redundantly give the bug number when I already gave the URL. > > Can we make it clear whether we are allowed/supposed to use the short > > form: > > > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/333531 > > > > ? > > > > As that redirects to the longer form I don't see a problem with allowing > that. > > Note that the short form does not allow for referencing individual > comments, because > https://bugs.gentoo.org/333531#c4 > redirects to > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=333531 > and not > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=333531#c4 Well, to be clear it doesn't actually redirect. If you didn't use one of those fancy new-age web browsers, you'd notice #c4 works as expected. I suspect it does some fancy JavaScript addressbar update though. Anyway, breaking '#c4' should be definitely treated as a bug, not expected limitation. -- Best regards, Michał Górny <http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/>
pgpkGDHB8vrMj.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
