Sergey Popov wrote:
> qt? (
> qt5? ( dev-lang/qtcore:5 )
> !qt5? ( dev-lang/qtcore:4 )
> )
>
> Fine by me, if you would ask.
May I suggest instead:
qt? (
qt5? ( dev-lang/qt$something:5 )
qt4? ( dev-lang/qt$something:4 )
)
Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
> > qt? (
> > > qt5? ( dev-lang/qtcore:5 )
> > > !qt5? ( dev-lang/qtcore:4 )
> > )
> >
> > Fine by me, if you would ask.
>
> That flag should be called "gui". Not "qt".
>
> This would be the real solution to gnome team's gtk/gtk2/gtk3 flag
> problem and to qt team's flag problem too.
Unlike gtk+, using Qt does not mean that there is any GUI.
Qt provides many things, and sometimes non-GUI Qt bits are used
independently in console-only applications.
//Peter
