On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Matthew Thode <prometheanf...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On 08/19/2015 12:37 PM, Zac Medico wrote: >> On 08/19/2015 09:33 AM, hasufell wrote: >>> I don't want to start a lot of bikeshed, but I think this information is >>> practically useless. >>> >>> If there has been a problem with a commit, ask the developer about his >>> repoman version (which I believe was the reason for this, unless you >>> want me to add "Package-Manager: paludis-2.4.0" to every commit ;). >>> >>> Let's just remove it. >>> >> >> The intent is to leave a record of the version of repoman used, which >> leaves an audit trail in case there's a bug in some some version (or to >> detect if someone is using an ancient version). It can especially be >> useful when new repoman checks need to be added for new EAPI features. >> > If repoman supported adding a signedoffby line I'd likely use it more > for commits. Still running repoman full before commit though.
I do not believe we have an requirement for adding Signed-off-by in the gentoo repository. Why do you feel the need to do that?
