On 10/17/2015 02:24 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > > 2. eapply_user really belongs in the PM, especially if it's run by > default. And it needs patch applying function. And if we have to > implement patch applying function anyway, we may as well make it public > to avoid unnecessary duplication. >
Unreliable. The ebuild may define its own src_prepare function or the PM might define eapply_user as a no-op, which is valid as per PMS.
