On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 7:55 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman <d...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 1:21 PM, hasufell <hasuf...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> I'd go so far to say allow people to do commits like: >> """ >> amd64 stabilizations >> >> <optional list of bugs> >> """ >> possibly pre-pending the rough domain like "kde", if any. I think kde >> herd already does that, no? > > Sounds sane to me.
I think that standardizing how we comment on bulk-stabilization commits makes more sense than making them less atomic. Not getting half a KDE update is actually one of the nice selling features of git. Plus, in the event of a disaster it also makes rollback easier. But, by all means we should update the wiki to recommend the standard way to document these changes. -- Rich
