On 10/28/2015 12:20 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > On 10/28/2015 07:23 AM, Ryan Hill wrote: > > >> Agreed. If there's one choice then "ssl" should be used. >> openssl/libressl/etc should really be considered sub-flags of ssl. > > > If we are introducing a new and proper way to define this it might > make sense to not refer to ssl (is anything actually using SSL these > days? I certainly hope not), tls is the natural replacement unless we > want to go for something more generic. >
That's nitpick for no gain and will break more configurations than any of the previously suggested formats.
