-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 02/11/15 14:24, Michael Palimaka wrote: > Which workflow do you mean? Most features seem optional, allowing > people to work as they wish. It's been a while since I looked at it outside of GHC, so please bear in mind these things might have changed since then.
The major obstacle for my company is that it doesn't work if you want to enforce (or even just allow) that author /= committer. Furthermore, when I used it it broke author dates and GPG signing. Lastly, you can't review a patch series -- you'll need either to squash the patches (which is done automatically), or review them independently. As for the workflow it to some degrees enforces (and certainly is optimised for), I don't have a link readily available. I could ask Austin from GHC about it if you are very curious (he's the one who sent it to me some time ago). Also, FWIW, I very much dislike arcanist. Herbert from the GHC team is working on a lite version[0] that I think might end up more pleasant. (However, it will likely be optimised for GHC.) [0] <https://github.com/haskell-infra/arc-lite> - -- Alexander berna...@gentoo.org https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWN2yuAAoJENQqWdRUGk8BCDQP/i86L/ACGcBeXoTZJ0PQ7J1J QX+af+dC9Lgd5STUbhNVJJDnKUFBtnplmdnMslCTqy/ppf1+0yfWEoRST49sEplS lgZcT2LxdM0NLT/pEH8q/i+NyqoM536s5cSiLupFpTMypquF/SM9qf0g9u3g1LLj +WiTT1IEuIYoKLx5bzUNPY9ELzagZebD8DZph23hpGwnIBpAQXX34ovhrg1i9J26 mK1W/knyzEV1vb8NW60TCh+RegaN5kFV2PpSDlE0DdyntNntfOr9y17GCpdTcEeY okyGlltFZ/zscyxWdk/9EhxzzngQCSrwN2xo9JN9Wv5Ay7klzg9zTRs3ZD8PIeDS w33Bxvevd6ZTl+cAIufMa80zVEWtvSw+HxEJ2LFXVE4X8soWI95sVzfLmSL5Da0M OO6/h7/pOImKRk7QrIWxqcTt6XgM3iYBFl0HfZijmzicIvh1JL/93KihQJUxV7yf dLiCZt06dGT4YC8YdAvmsvzTW2FEh0NwnljmarDfu0WCZAfild2/MRti3IlHXFsu +PE8pkQ+bHAwm03EL1P7l6iR3XYSSnscrQSv4c0QgczcoZV7tm+O2jb2RVAKau6D eub0BOb5pYwt2VAzOjOrBSzjGRluGxf1RMrlNauWEgk8N181dse6ztr/43IDh00Z 7TtFY6Vqf+ufy25E2jyC =jJrQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
