-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 02/10/2016 05:15 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> On 10/02/16 12:09 PM, Brian Dolbec wrote:
>> On Wed, 10 Feb 2016 10:26:12 -0600 William Hubbs 
>> <willi...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> 
> 
>>>> Often the decision to procrastinate is a decision that is 
>>>> rewarded. That should be considered carefully.
>>> 
>>> + 10000.
>>> 
>>> I also saw another issue that made me shudder. If we change the
>>> default to eudev, people who are running separate /usr are 
>>> going to think they can kill their initramfs's, because people 
>>> in gentoo conflated the separate /usr and initramfs issue with 
>>> udev [1].
>>> 
>>> William
>>> 
>>> [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=573760#C4
> 
>> That isn't a worthwhile reason to procrastinate. IMO we're going 
>> to get those _ANYWAY_  no matter how long we wait, within reason 
>> of course.
> 
>> There will always be users that can't read/type/whatever and
>> fail and file bugs.
> 
>> So if we have to wait for one (or more) users to forget about the
>> initramfs crud & confusion, we'll be waiting 20 years.  By then
>> even systemd will have been replaced by something else...
> 
> 
> 
> Yeah I second this -- it was decided officially by council (what,
> 2 years ago now?) that separate-/usr-without-initramfs doesn't need
> to be officially supported anymore, and so if things break that it
> is up to end-users to ensure they pick up the pieces.
> 
> Although it is likely that eudev *will* keep installation onto /
> and out of /usr to help with this not-officially-supported
> situation in Gentoo, that doesn't mean the other projects have to
> stay out of /usr, and "it worked before the upgrade but doesn't
> now" certainly doesn't mean it's a valid bug.  If a user or
> sysadmin drops their initramfs when they have a separate-/usr
> system, any resulting breakage is on them.
> 

+1

- -- 
Daniel Campbell - Gentoo Developer
OpenPGP Key: 0x1EA055D6 @ hkp://keys.gnupg.net
fpr: AE03 9064 AE00 053C 270C  1DE4 6F7A 9091 1EA0 55D6
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=d5dN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to