On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 09:40:53 -0500 james <gar...@verizon.net> wrote: > On 06/16/2016 10:04 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > > On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 08:59:44 -0500 > > james <gar...@verizon.net> wrote: > > > >> On 06/16/2016 02:51 AM, Alexander Berntsen wrote: > >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > >>> Hash: SHA512 > >>> > >>> On 16/06/16 09:39, Daniel Campbell wrote: > >>>> I guess what I mean is these outside developers could continue > >>>> hacking and/or breaking things, or whatever else, without worrying > >>>> about their "official" branch. We could have a standard that > >>>> assumes Gentoo pulls their 'master' branch and they keep other > >>>> stuff in 'dev', or some other model. We'll need to decide on *some* > >>>> branch, but putting it in writing would make things clearer for > >>>> prospective repo maintainers. > >> > >>> OK, then I think that it would be a good idea to have a gentoo-ci > >>> branch, or similar, if the assumption is merely that this is where > >>> Gentoo developers will look when evaluating your repository. > >>> > >> Ok, if we go this route, here is a basic simple question. Why can't the > >> "gentoo-ci" be a package, or group of packages that runs in a private > >> persons own resources, regardless it is a single gentoo server or a > >> small cluster (openstack)? That way, those gentoo-ciruns can be > >> performed by the proxy or the author thus reducing the workload for QA > >> or other devs. I guess what I'm really asking is/will the gentoo-ci be > >> packaged up for the gentoo community to use, on a small set of packages? > > > > dev-util/pkgcheck is the QA tool used (you want -9999). > > > > https://github.com/gentoo/travis-repo-checks is the wrapper that is > > used to run it in parallel. A lot of hackery, and master is outdated > > for -9999. No time to fix it. The repo-mirror-ci branch is better but > > then, I updated it recently for some local hacks. > > > > https://bitbucket.org/mgorny/pkgcheck-result-parser is the thingie used > > to turn pkgcheck XML reports into pretty HTML. Also a bit hacky, > > especially with the error & warning lists hardcoded. > > > > https://bitbucket.org/mgorny/repo-mirror-ci all the extra scriptery > > used to run it all. No time to clean it up more than I already did. > > > > EXCELLENT ! I seem to be mostly interested in orphaned, broken and > controversial packages these days....not sure if that is a good thing or > not. > > Do these ci tools work on gentoo snaps? [1]
I have no clue. And I doubt I'll be interested in testing that thing. > [1] > http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2016/06/goodbye-apt-and-yum-ubuntus-snap-apps-are-coming-to-distros-everywhere/ -- Best regards, Michał Górny <http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/>
pgpaVi2p9M_HX.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
