On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 15:42:53 +0200
Greg KH <gre...@gentoo.org> wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 11:04:34AM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Dnia 26 października 2016 10:49:04 CEST, Joshua Kinard <ku...@gentoo.org> 
> > napisał(a):  
> > >On 10/25/2016 13:15, William Hubbs wrote:  
> > >> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 01:10:06PM -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:  
> > >>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 1:01 PM, William Hubbs <willi...@gentoo.org>  
> > >wrote:  
> > >>>> If you are not using /dev/disk/by-* paths in fstab, you do not need  
> > >to  
> > >>> take any action for this news item.  
> > >>>>
> > >>>> If you are, it is very critical that you update fstab AS SOON AS  
> > >>> POSSIBLE. Your system will become unbootable in the future if you do
> > >>> not  do so.
> > >>>
> > >>> Err, what is changing that will make systems unbootable?
> > >>>
> > >>> I am fairly certain systems running systemd will continue to work
> > >>> properly with either syntax.  
> > >>  
> > >>  They probably will.
> > >>   
> > >>> If this is about the udev-settle issue for OpenRC, I would urge you  
> > >to  
> > >>> reconsider that.  
> > >>  
> > >>  There isn't anything to reconsider afaik. The problem is that
> > >>  /dev/disk/by-* are only created by udev/eudev, but the other syntax
> > >>  works regardless of which device manager  you use, so this is the  
> > >safer  
> > >>  route.
> > >> 
> > >>  William
> > >>   
> > >
> > >I take it us museum relics still using jurassic-era device names like
> > >/dev/sd* or /dev/md* aren't affected by this?  Cthulhu-forbid Linux
> > >device
> > >naming gets any more complicated than using UUID's.  What's next,
> > >saving the
> > >serial numbers of discovered disks in an overly-complicated
> > >key/value-based
> > >non-SQL database format?  
> > 
> > Wait full you-know-who notices that disk device names are not predictable 
> > and fixes that.  
> 
> disk device names have never been predictable, don't get comfortable :)
> 
> If you rely on them, you need to be aware that they can change at
> times...

Neither were network device names. But now they are! As long as you
predict to which USB port the dongle will be plugged ;-).

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny
<http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/>

Attachment: pgpqfwy5aQWV1.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to