On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 06:19:28PM -0500, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > On 16/11/16 06:16 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 06:09:59PM -0500, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > >> On 16/11/16 03:21 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > >>> > >>> I can make the service scripts call the systemd-tmpfiles service if it > >>> is available or if not call the opentmpfiles implementation. > >>> > >>> I'm not sure whether it is worth having a separate package for the > >>> service scripts in this case. > >> > >> That would depend on where the service scripts are sitting, I guess -- > >> do you mean here that openrc will keep its current tmpfiles.dev and > >> tmpfiles.setup scripts? If that's the case wouldn't openrc need to > >> RDEPEND or PDEPEND on virtual/tmpfiles ? > > > > No, those scripts will be removed from OpenRC. If you grep through > > OpenRC, you will see that once they are removed, they are never actually > > referred to by any other services that are part of OpenRC. > > > > The scripts will be put in opentmpfiles and that ebuild will install > > them. > > > > William > > > > Then we're back to the exact same issue. opentmpfiles won't be > installed if systemd is installed, so the scripts won't get installed. Why not? we can just add opentmpfiles to the pdepend of systemd the same way udev-init-scripts is.
William
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
