On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:58 PM, Martin Vaeth <mar...@mvath.de> wrote: > > For instance, the systemd-tmpfiles implementation has some > features concerning btrfs which are not (yet) supported by > opentmpfiles. Some users might want to use that features. >
Well, this was the main reason I suggested that we could just use systemd-tmpfiles. It is essentially everybody's reference implementation already. But, if somebody wants to re-implement it that is their right, and certainly the virtual is the way to go about it. -- Rich
