On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 6:25 PM, William Hubbs <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 06:19:28PM -0500, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: >> On 16/11/16 06:16 PM, William Hubbs wrote: >> > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 06:09:59PM -0500, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: >> >> On 16/11/16 03:21 PM, William Hubbs wrote: >> >>> >> >>> I can make the service scripts call the systemd-tmpfiles service if it >> >>> is available or if not call the opentmpfiles implementation. >> >>> >> >>> I'm not sure whether it is worth having a separate package for the >> >>> service scripts in this case. >> >> >> >> That would depend on where the service scripts are sitting, I guess -- >> >> do you mean here that openrc will keep its current tmpfiles.dev and >> >> tmpfiles.setup scripts? If that's the case wouldn't openrc need to >> >> RDEPEND or PDEPEND on virtual/tmpfiles ? >> > >> > No, those scripts will be removed from OpenRC. If you grep through >> > OpenRC, you will see that once they are removed, they are never actually >> > referred to by any other services that are part of OpenRC. >> > >> > The scripts will be put in opentmpfiles and that ebuild will install >> > them. >> > >> > William >> > >> >> Then we're back to the exact same issue. opentmpfiles won't be >> installed if systemd is installed, so the scripts won't get installed. > > Why not? we can just add opentmpfiles to the pdepend of systemd the > same way udev-init-scripts is.
Sorry, but that really does not make any sense.
