On 10-08-2017 16:09:53 +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > ...which probably makes sense if you treat is as a continuation of mail- > client/mutt package. However, since we package it separately, using > the same name is going to create more confusion than renaming it to > match the package name. > > If I install 'dev-foo/foobar', I usually expect to find the program name > 'foobar', not just 'bar'.
I think we're clear now that the eselect idea wasn't the proper way forward. Nicholas and I are discussing off-list what the next approach will be, given the suggestions you and others have done in this thread. Thanks, Fabian -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level
Description: Digital signature