On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 06:58:57AM +0200, Nicolas Bock wrote: > On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 09:11:19AM +0200, Nicolas Bock wrote: > >Hi, > > > >I would like to add neomutt to the tree. This new package is meant as > >an alternative and not a replacement of the existing mutt package. > > Thanks for all of the great suggestions and feedback! > > This is round two. I have update the ebuild with all your > suggestions. I have also added support for eselecting between mutt > and neomutt. Before the eselect ebuild can land though, we need to > rename the mutt binary so that the managed link can be called > mutt.
I am against the eselect idea. If the binary upstream is neomutt, that is what we should call it, and we should not rename the mutt binary. William
Description: Digital signature