On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 06:58:57AM +0200, Nicolas Bock wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 09:11:19AM +0200, Nicolas Bock wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I would like to add neomutt to the tree. This new package is meant as 
> >an alternative and not a replacement of the existing mutt package.
> Thanks for all of the great suggestions and feedback!
> This is round two. I have update the ebuild with all your 
> suggestions. I have also added support for eselecting between mutt 
> and neomutt. Before the eselect ebuild can land though, we need to 
> rename the mutt binary so that the managed link can be called 
> mutt.

I am against the eselect idea. If the binary upstream is neomutt, that
is what we should call it, and we should not rename the mutt binary.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to