El 15/08/17 a las 17:50, R0b0t1 escribió: > Where was this decision discussed? https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-hardened/message/62ebc2e26d91e8f079197c2c83788cff
And many other threads in that list for example, those are just blueness (the package maintainer) conclussions. > The last available kernel is > apparently receiving long term support, there may not be any reason to > remove it. Not by the original upstream, and definitively not in the way in which Grsec used to (manually cherrypicking security related commits and not just those marked as security related). Although minipli's kernel patches are good and I personally recommend them, this is not something the Gentoo Hardened team will do. Also they probably should be renamed something else. > If it isn't broken and creating work yet I'm not sure why > anyone cares. Go to #gentoo-hardened and see how there is people asking about this again and again :P
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
