On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 5:37 AM, Brian Evans <grkni...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On 2/7/2018 9:54 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
>> # Matt Turner <matts...@gentoo.org> (06 Feb 2018)
>> # Dead and unused
>> # Masked for removal in 30 days. Bug #646838
>> From e590965cdeb0c921194740da0481c85afaa1ebae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Matt Turner <matts...@gentoo.org>
>> Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 14:02:59 -0800
>> Subject: x11-base/xorg-server: Remove dead x11-proto/xf86rushproto dependency
>> rushproto hasn't been required since upstream commit 8ec79e05feac (in
>> 2005!), and even then it wasn't actually needed!
>> Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
>> x11-base/xorg-server/xorg-server-1.19.5.ebuild | 3 +--
>> x11-base/xorg-server/xorg-server-1.19.6.ebuild | 3 +--
>> x11-base/xorg-server/xorg-server-9999.ebuild | 3 +--
>> 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> Please don't edit dependencies in-line like this.
> This warranted a revbump as users will be asking how to remove
> x11-proto/xf86rushproto. It won't come up for depclean because of
> xorg-server not being scheduled for rebuild automatically until the next
> time it is upgraded or --changed-deps option is used (uncommon).
Wait, since it was just in DEPEND, I don't understand the problem.
If it were in RDEPEND, I could understand. But in DEPEND, it'll get
depcleaned without any problem as far as I can tell.