On Wed, 28 Feb 2018 11:10:13 +0100 "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfri...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> another option would be to (try to) revive glibc-2.5, 2.12, and 2.17 instead. > > Yes I know they are even older, but these are the versions that RHEL uses, > and > for which RH still provides support (until 2020 for 2.5, 2024 for 2.12)... > https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Release#Distribution_Branch_Mapping > > That however would require that the RHEL patchsets are public somehwere. > Which > I doubt... after all there's an "E" in RHEL... You maybe won't get the full details of the changes but all the patches are here. This looks like a much better breakdown than you get with their kernel patches. https://git.centos.org/summary/rpms!glibc.git -- James Le Cuirot (chewi) Gentoo Linux Developer
pgps0dqy2j8lW.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
