W dniu pon, 09.07.2018 o godzinie 22∶12 +0200, użytkownik Manuel Rüger napisał: > On 09.07.2018 10:40, Michał Górny wrote: > > Hi, > > > > We currently don't enforce any particular standard for e-mail addresses > > for developers committing to gentoo.git. FWICS, the majority of > > developers is using their @gentoo.org e-mail addresses. However, a few > > developers are using some other addresses. > > > > Using [email protected] e-mail addresses generally causes problems > > in accounting for commits. For example, our retirement scripts can't > > detect commits made using non-Gentoo e-mail address. My dev-timeline > > scripts [1] account for all emails in LDAP (which doesn't cover all > > addresses developers use). FWIK gkeys accounts for all addresses > > in the OpenPGP key UIDs. In my opinion, that's a lot of hoops to jump > > through to workaround bad practice. > > > > Therefore, I'd like to start enforcing (at the level of the hook > > verifying signatures) that all commits made to gentoo.git (and other > > repositories requiring dev signatures) are made using @gentoo.org e-mail > > address (for committer field). > > > > Is anyone opposed to that? Does anyone know of a valid reason to use > > [email protected] address when committing? > > > > [1]:https://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/dev-timeline.html > > > > Hi Michał, > > just to be clear on the wording, are you talking about the author email > of a git commit (authorship) or the comitter email to the upstream git > repository (committer)? >
«[...] are made using @gentoo.org e-mail address **(for committer field)**.» -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
