On Thu, 2019-12-19 at 19:43 +0100, Sebastian Pipping wrote: > On 19.12.19 18:37, Michał Górny wrote: > > We have a better alternative that lets us limit the impact on the users. > > Why not use it? > > Which one? The CMake bootstrap copy? The adding to stage3 one? >
Bootstrap version. It doesn't have to be a strict copy. The whole point is that even if it's buggy, unmaintained, vulnerable, it's impact is going to be minimal. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
